A theory of constitutional standards and civil liberty
The paper examines the tradeoff between coercion and self protection in a democracy. This tradeoff can be used to explain why potentially intolerant majorities in a democracy protect the rights of unpopular groups. Due to noise induced by imprecise auditing majority, groups will not necessarily impose legal standards which stringently punish the minority groups for deviant behavior. The reason is that they may end up severely punishing their own group by mistake. These effects are first investigated in a static model to get some insight. Then the model is extended to a dynamic version where the majority can impose increasingly intolerant standards on the minority by reducing the noise in the auditing. In this setting Markovian equilibria are investigated and the relation between the static and the dynamic model is discussed. It is shown that societies with high political turnover due to population changes are apt to choose tolerant legal standards. Societies with low turnover are more apt to choose more intolerant and unstable ones.
- Rights and the liberal paradoxes
- Justice, liberty, unanimity and the axioms of identity
- On the economics of basic liberties
- Ideology and endogenous constitutions
- A general impossibility theorem and its application to individual rights
- The theory of justice
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 701916
- On robust constitution design
- The nature and measurement of freedom
- Dynamic stability and reform of political institutions
- Statehood, democracy and preindustrial development
- Ideology and endogenous constitutions
- On dynamic compromise
- Endogenous institutions and political extremism
- CHAOTIC DYNAMICS OF FINANCING INVESTMENT
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7594192 (Why is no real title available?)
- Liberty, security, and accountability: the rise and fall of illiberal democracies
- A dynamic model of authoritarian social control
This page was built for publication: A theory of constitutional standards and civil liberty
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2729263)