Why the naive Bayesian classifier for clinical diagnostics or monitoring can dominate the proper one even for massive data sets

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-12355-4_23MaRDI QIDQ2787331zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Hans-J. Lenz

Publication date 25 February 2016

Published in Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 11 (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12355-4_23

zbMATH Keywords

over-fittingcurse of dimensiondependency structures

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects) (62H30) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Recommendations

• When is the naive Bayes approximation not so naive?
• When learning naive Bayesian classifiers preserves monotonicity
• Variable selection for naïve Bayes classification
• Some theory for Fisher's linear discriminant function, `naive Bayes', and some alternatives when there are many more variables than observations
• Evidence and scenario sensitivities in naive Bayesian classifiers

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 986136 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 51422 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3010031 (Why is no real title available?)
• Miscellanea. Small-sample degrees of freedom with multiple imputation

This page was built for publication: Why the naive Bayesian classifier for clinical diagnostics or monitoring can dominate the proper one even for massive data sets

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2787331)