Some remarks on the uniqueness of the complex projective spaces

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2801732

DOI10.1112/BLMS/BDW009zbMATH Open1355.32015arXiv1510.02242OpenAlexW3105274718MaRDI QIDQ2801732FDOQ2801732


Authors: Ping Li Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 21 April 2016

Published in: Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We first notice in this article that if a compact K"{a}hler manifold has the same integral cohomology ring and Pontrjagin classes as the complex projective space mathbbCPn, then it is biholomorphic to mathbbCPn provided n is odd. The same holds for even n if we further assume that M is simply-connected. This technically refines a classical result of Hirzebruch-Kodaira and Yau. This observation, together with a result of Dessai and Wilking, enables us to characterize all mathbbCPn in terms of homotopy type under mild symmetry. When n=4, we can drop the requirement on Pontrjagin classes by showing that a simply-connected compact K"{a}hler manifold having the same integral cohomology ring as mathbbCP4 is biholomorphic to mathbbCP4, which improves on results of Fujita and Libgober-Wood.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.02242




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (6)





This page was built for publication: Some remarks on the uniqueness of the complex projective spaces

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2801732)