What level of statistical model should we use in small area estimation?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2804159
DOI10.1111/ANZS.12115zbMATH Open1336.62046OpenAlexW1626338131MaRDI QIDQ2804159FDOQ2804159
Authors: Mohammad-Reza Namazi-Rad, David G. Steel
Publication date: 28 April 2016
Published in: Australian \& New Zealand Journal of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/anzs.12115
Recommendations
- Small Area Estimation Using Estimated Population Level Auxiliary Data
- A spatial unit level model for small area estimation
- On small area estimation under a sub-area level model
- An applied comparison of area-level linear mixed models in small area estimation
- Pseudo hierarchical Bayes small area estimation combining unit level models and survey weights
Cites Work
- Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
- Mixed models. Theory and applications with R
- Some new developments in small area estimation
- Best Linear Unbiased Estimation and Prediction under a Selection Model
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Mean-Squared Error Estimation in Transformed Fay–Herriot Models
- Small area estimation: an appraisal. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors
- M-quantile models for small area estimation
- The Estimation of the Mean Squared Error of Small-Area Estimators
- The BLUPs are not best when it comes to bootstrapping
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- An Introduction to Model-Based Survey Sampling with Applications
Cited In (1)
This page was built for publication: What level of statistical model should we use in small area estimation?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2804159)