Which style of reasoning to choose in the face of conflicting information?

DOI10.1093/LOGCOM/EXT030zbMATH Open1444.03117OpenAlexW1977662060MaRDI QIDQ2804333FDOQ2804333

Authors: Joke Meheus, Christian Straßer, Peter Verdée 

Publication date: 28 April 2016

Published in: Journal of Logic and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/7251335

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2170946
• Nonmonotonic inconsistency
• Constrained consequence
• Adaptive logics for defeasible reasoning. Applications in argumentation, normative reasoning and default reasoning
• Two theories of nonmonotonic reasoning

zbMATH Keywords

adaptive logicsdefeasible reasoningdynamic proofsmaximal consistent subsetsreasoning from inconsistent informationRescher-Manor consequences

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Paraconsistent logics (03B53) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Logic in computer science (03B70)

Cited In (9)

• Adaptive Proofs for Networks of Partial Structures
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The inapplicability of (selected) paraconsistent logics
• Adaptive logic characterizations of input/output logic
• Constrained consequence
• Preferential semantics using non-smooth preference relations
• Modular semantics for theories: an approach to paraconsistent reasoning
• Nonmonotonic inconsistency
• A simple and non-trivial Ramsey test

This page was built for publication: Which style of reasoning to choose in the face of conflicting information?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2804333)