Which style of reasoning to choose in the face of conflicting information?

DOI10.1093/LOGCOM/EXT030MaRDI QIDQ2804333zbMATHOpenAlexFDO

Authors Joke Meheus, Christian Straßer, Peter Verdée

Publication date 28 April 2016

Published in Journal of Logic and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/7251335

zbMATH Keywords

adaptive logicsdefeasible reasoningdynamic proofsmaximal consistent subsetsreasoning from inconsistent informationRescher-Manor consequences

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Paraconsistent logics (03B53) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Logic in computer science (03B70)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2170946
• Nonmonotonic inconsistency
• Constrained consequence
• Adaptive logics for defeasible reasoning. Applications in argumentation, normative reasoning and default reasoning
• Two theories of nonmonotonic reasoning

Cited in

(9)

• A simple and non-trivial Ramsey test
• Adaptive proofs for networks of partial structures
• The inapplicability of (selected) paraconsistent logics
• Nonmonotonic inconsistency
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2170946 (Why is no real title available?)
• Modular semantics for theories: an approach to paraconsistent reasoning
• Constrained consequence
• Preferential semantics using non-smooth preference relations
• Adaptive logic characterizations of input/output logic

This page was built for publication: Which style of reasoning to choose in the face of conflicting information?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2804333)