A comparative analysis of the successive lumping and the lattice path counting algorithms

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2804417

DOI10.1017/JPR.2015.12zbMATH Open1343.60109arXiv1507.05301OpenAlexW2187915630MaRDI QIDQ2804417FDOQ2804417


Authors: Michael N. Katehakis, Laurens C. Smit, Floske M. Spieksma Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 29 April 2016

Published in: Journal of Applied Probability (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: This article provides a comparison of the successive lumping (SL) methodology with the popular lattice path counting algorithm in obtaining rate matrices for queueing models, satisfying the quasi birth and death structure. The two methodologies are compared both in terms of applicability requirements and numerical complexity by analyzing their performance for the same classical queueing models. The main findings are: i) When both methods are applicable SL based algorithms outperform the lattice path counting algorithm (LPCA). ii) There are important classes of problems (e.g., models with (level) non-homogenous rates or with finite state spaces) for which the SL methodology is applicable and for which the LPCA cannot be used. iii) Another main advantage of successive lumping algorithms over LPCAs is that the former includes a method to compute the steady state distribution using this rate matrix.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.05301




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (4)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: A comparative analysis of the successive lumping and the lattice path counting algorithms

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2804417)