Contraction-free proofs and finitary games for linear logic
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:2805162)
Abstract: In the standard sequent presentations of Girard's Linear Logic (LL), there are two "non-decreasing" rules, where the premises are not smaller than the conclusion, namely the cut and the contraction rules. It is a universal concern to eliminate the cut rule. We show that, using an admissible modification of the tensor rule, contractions can be eliminated, and that cuts can be simultaneously limited to a single initial occurrence. This view leads to a consistent, but incomplete game model for LL with exponentials, which is finitary, in the sense that each play is finite. The game is based on a set of inference rules which does not enjoy cut elimination. Nevertheless, the cut rule is valid in the model.
Recommendations
Cites work
- A game semantics for linear logic
- A short proof of the strong normalization of classical natural deduction with disjunction
- A Theory for Game Theories
- Admissibility of structural rules for extensions of contraction-free sequent calculi
- Contraction-elimination for implicational logics
- Contraction-free proofs and finitary games for linear logic
- Contraction-free sequent calculi for intuitionistic logic
- Corrigenda to: ``The linear abstract machine
- Games and full completeness for multiplicative linear logic
- Linear logic
- Locus solum: From the rules of logic to the logic of rules.
- Normalization without reducibility
- The linear abstract machine
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: Contraction-free proofs and finitary games for linear logic
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2805162)