Reader reaction: A note on the evaluation of group testing algorithms in the presence of misclassification
DOI10.1111/BIOM.12385zbMATH Open1393.62085OpenAlexW2144163159WikidataQ37839016 ScholiaQ37839016MaRDI QIDQ2805225FDOQ2805225
Authors: Yaakov Malinovsky, Paul S. Albert, Anindya Roy 
Publication date: 10 May 2016
Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12385
Recommendations
Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Testing in survival analysis and censored data (62N03)
Cites Work
Cited In (13)
- Discussion on: ``Is group testing ready for prime-time in disease identification?
- The efficient design of Nested Group Testing algorithms for disease identification in clustered data
- Sterrett procedure for the generalized group testing problem
- D-optimality of Group Testing for Estimation of Correlated Rare Diseases with Misclassification
- Revisiting Nested Group Testing Procedures: New Results, Comparisons, and Robustness
- On optimal policy in the group testing with incomplete identification
- Is group testing ready for prime-time in disease identification?
- The objective function controversy for group testing: much ado about nothing?
- Group testing case identification with biomarker information
- Prediction-driven pooled testing methods: application to HIV treatment monitoring in Rakai, Uganda
- Robust group testing for multiple traits with misclassification
- Hierarchical group testing for multiple infections
- Sequential estimation in the group testing problem
This page was built for publication: Reader reaction: A note on the evaluation of group testing algorithms in the presence of misclassification
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2805225)
