Comparison of numerical methods for ternary fluid flows: immersed boundary, level-set, and phase-field methods

DOI10.12941/JKSIAM.2016.20.083MaRDI QIDQ2808858zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Darae Jeong, Yongho Choi, Junseok Kim, Seunggyu Lee

Publication date 25 May 2016

Published in Journal of the Korean Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.12941/jksiam.2016.20.083

zbMATH Keywords

immersed boundary methodlevel set methodNavier-Stokes equationphase-field methodcontinuum surface forceternary fluid flows

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Finite difference methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics (76M20) Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible viscous fluids (76D05) Three or more component flows (76T30)

Recommendations

• Phase-Field Models for Multi-Component Fluid Flows
• Assessment of volume of fluid and immersed boundary methods for droplet computations
• Deforming fluid domains within the finite element method: five mesh-based tracking methods in comparison
• Three-dimensional volume-conserving immersed boundary model for two-phase fluid flows
• Comparing the convected level-set and the Allen-Cahn phase-field methods in AMR/C simulations of two-phase flows

Cited in

(1)

• Mathematical model of contractile ring-driven cytokinesis in a three-dimensional domain

This page was built for publication: Comparison of numerical methods for ternary fluid flows: immersed boundary, level-set, and phase-field methods

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2808858)