Comparison of numerical methods for ternary fluid flows: immersed boundary, level-set, and phase-field methods

DOI10.12941/JKSIAM.2016.20.083zbMATH Open1338.76018OpenAlexW2342916371MaRDI QIDQ2808858FDOQ2808858

Authors: Darae Jeong, Yongho Choi, Junseok Kim, Seunggyu Lee 

Publication date: 25 May 2016

Published in: Journal of the Korean Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.12941/jksiam.2016.20.083

Recommendations

• Phase-Field Models for Multi-Component Fluid Flows
• Assessment of volume of fluid and immersed boundary methods for droplet computations
• Deforming fluid domains within the finite element method: five mesh-based tracking methods in comparison
• Three-dimensional volume-conserving immersed boundary model for two-phase fluid flows
• Comparing the convected level-set and the Allen-Cahn phase-field methods in AMR/C simulations of two-phase flows

zbMATH Keywords

immersed boundary methodlevel set methodNavier-Stokes equationphase-field methodcontinuum surface forceternary fluid flows

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Finite difference methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics (76M20) Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible viscous fluids (76D05) Three or more component flows (76T30)

Cited In (1)

• Mathematical model of contractile ring-driven cytokinesis in a three-dimensional domain

This page was built for publication: Comparison of numerical methods for ternary fluid flows: immersed boundary, level-set, and phase-field methods

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2808858)