Should we really use post-hoc tests based on mean-ranks?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2810763
zbMath1360.62208arXiv1505.02288MaRDI QIDQ2810763
Giorgio Corani, Francesca Mangili, Alessio Benavoli
Publication date: 6 June 2016
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.02288
Nonparametric hypothesis testing (62G10) Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence (68T05)
Related Items (19)
Predicting online invitation responses with a competing risk model using privacy-friendly social event data ⋮ An enhanced random forest with canonical partial least squares for classification ⋮ The great multivariate time series classification bake off: a review and experimental evaluation of recent algorithmic advances ⋮ Rough cognitive ensembles ⋮ Multilabel classification using low-rank decomposition ⋮ Short-term cognitive networks, flexible reasoning and nonsynaptic learning ⋮ \texttt{TIRPCLo}: efficient and complete mining of time intervals-related patterns ⋮ Capped \(L_{2,p}\)-norm metric based robust least squares twin support vector machine for pattern classification ⋮ Extremely simple classifier based on fuzzy logic and gene expression programming ⋮ ROCKET: exceptionally fast and accurate time series classification using random convolutional kernels ⋮ Interpretable time series classification using linear models and multi-resolution multi-domain symbolic representations ⋮ A probabilistic classifier ensemble weighting scheme based on cross-validated accuracy estimates ⋮ TS-CHIEF: a scalable and accurate forest algorithm for time series classification ⋮ Deep learning for time series classification: a review ⋮ Correntropy-based metric for robust twin support vector machine ⋮ HIVE-COTE 2.0: a new meta ensemble for time series classification ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Optimised one-class classification performance ⋮ Multi-Label Classification Neural Networks with Hard Logical Constraints
This page was built for publication: Should we really use post-hoc tests based on mean-ranks?