Should we really use post-hoc tests based on mean-ranks?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2810763

zbMath1360.62208arXiv1505.02288MaRDI QIDQ2810763

Giorgio Corani, Francesca Mangili, Alessio Benavoli

Publication date: 6 June 2016

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.02288




Related Items (19)

Predicting online invitation responses with a competing risk model using privacy-friendly social event dataAn enhanced random forest with canonical partial least squares for classificationThe great multivariate time series classification bake off: a review and experimental evaluation of recent algorithmic advancesRough cognitive ensemblesMultilabel classification using low-rank decompositionShort-term cognitive networks, flexible reasoning and nonsynaptic learning\texttt{TIRPCLo}: efficient and complete mining of time intervals-related patternsCapped \(L_{2,p}\)-norm metric based robust least squares twin support vector machine for pattern classificationExtremely simple classifier based on fuzzy logic and gene expression programmingROCKET: exceptionally fast and accurate time series classification using random convolutional kernelsInterpretable time series classification using linear models and multi-resolution multi-domain symbolic representationsA probabilistic classifier ensemble weighting scheme based on cross-validated accuracy estimatesTS-CHIEF: a scalable and accurate forest algorithm for time series classificationDeep learning for time series classification: a reviewCorrentropy-based metric for robust twin support vector machineHIVE-COTE 2.0: a new meta ensemble for time series classificationUnnamed ItemOptimised one-class classification performanceMulti-Label Classification Neural Networks with Hard Logical Constraints




This page was built for publication: Should we really use post-hoc tests based on mean-ranks?