Is spacetime absolutely or just most probably Lorentzian?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2822170

DOI10.1088/0264-9381/33/16/165009zbMATH Open1346.83066arXiv1509.00911OpenAlexW2146032531MaRDI QIDQ2822170FDOQ2822170


Authors: Aharon Davidson, Ben Yellin Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 27 September 2016

Published in: Classical and Quantum Gravity (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Pre-gauging the cosmological scale factor a(t) does not introduce unphysical degrees of freedom into the exact FLRW classical solution. It seems to lead, however, to a non-dynamical mini superspace. The missing ingredient, a generalised momentum enjoying canonical Dirac (rather than Poisson) brackets with the lapse function n(t), calls for measure scaling which can be realised by means of a scalar field. The latter is essential for establishing a geometrical connection with the 5-dimensional Kaluza-Klein Schwarzschild-deSitter black hole. Contrary to the Hartle-Hawking approach, (i) The t-independent wave function psi(a) is traded for an explicit t-dependent psi(n,t), (ii) The classical FLRW configuration does play a major role in the structure of the 'most classical' cosmological wave packet, and (iii) The non-singular Euclid/Lorentz crossovers get quantum mechanically smeared.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.00911




Recommendations





Cited In (5)





This page was built for publication: Is spacetime absolutely or just most probably Lorentzian?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2822170)