Comparison between two multi-objective optimization algorithms: PAES and MGDA. Testing MGDA on Kriging metamodels
DOI10.1007/978-94-007-5288-7_13zbMATH Open1270.65029OpenAlexW88038006MaRDI QIDQ2838342FDOQ2838342
Authors: Adrien Zerbinati, Jean-Antoine Désidéri, R. Duvigneau 
Publication date: 9 July 2013
Published in: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5288-7_13
Recommendations
- Meta-model-assisted MGDA for multi-objective functional optimization
- Multiple-gradient descent algorithm for Pareto-front identification
- Multiple-gradient descent algorithm (MGDA) for multiobjective optimization
- A stochastic multiple gradient descent algorithm
- Bi-objective hypervolume-based Pareto optimization
numerical experimentsmulti-objective optimizationPareto setsteepest descent methodevolutionary strategiesderivative-free algorithmsgradient computationlocal finite differencesmultiple gradient descent algorithm
Cites Work
Cited In (6)
- Multiple-gradient descent algorithm (MGDA) for multiobjective optimization
- Meta-model-assisted MGDA for multi-objective functional optimization
- Comparison between two multi-objective optimization algorithms: PAES and MGDA. Testing MGDA on Kriging metamodels
- Multiple-gradient descent algorithm for Pareto-front identification
- Parametric optimization of pulsating jets in unsteady flow by multiple-gradient descent algorithm (MGDA)
- An efficient multi-objective PSO algorithm assisted by Kriging metamodel for expensive black-box problems
This page was built for publication: Comparison between two multi-objective optimization algorithms: PAES and MGDA. Testing MGDA on Kriging metamodels
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2838342)
