Spectra in Abstract Argumentation: An Analysis of Minimal Change
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2851247
DOI10.1007/978-3-642-40564-8_18zbMATH Open1405.68338OpenAlexW2107590908MaRDI QIDQ2851247FDOQ2851247
Authors: Ringo Baumann, Gerhard Brewka
Publication date: 10 October 2013
Published in: Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40564-8_18
Recommendations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6292806
- Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument
- Abstract Argumentation in Dynamic Logic: Representation, Reasoning and Change
- Semantic change and extension enforcement in abstract argumentation
- Revisiting Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- On the semantics of abstract argumentation
- On minimality and consistency tolerance in logical argumentation frameworks
- Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation
Cited In (6)
- Abstract Argumentation in Dynamic Logic: Representation, Reasoning and Change
- Persistence and monotony properties of argumentation semantics
- The complexity of repairing, adjusting, and aggregating of extensions in abstract argumentation
- Semantic change and extension enforcement in abstract argumentation
- What does it take to enforce an argument? Minimal change in abstract argumentation
- Open problems in abstract argumentation
This page was built for publication: Spectra in Abstract Argumentation: An Analysis of Minimal Change
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2851247)