Rado's conjecture implies that all stationary set preserving forcings are semiproper
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2853979
DOI10.1142/S0219061313500013zbMATH Open1300.03022OpenAlexW2171603704WikidataQ123197515 ScholiaQ123197515MaRDI QIDQ2853979FDOQ2853979
Authors: Philipp Doebler
Publication date: 17 October 2013
Published in: Journal of Mathematical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219061313500013
Recommendations
- Rado's conjecture and presaturation of the nonstationary ideal on ω1
- Forcing axiom failure for any \(\lambda >\aleph_1\)
- Rado's conjecture and its Baire version
- \(\Pi_2\) consequences of \(\mathsf{BMM}+\mathsf{NS}_{\omega_1}\) is precipitous and the semiproperness of stationary set preserving forcings
- Conjectures of Rado and Chang and special Aronszajn trees
Chang's conjecturesemiproper forcingRado's conjecturesemistationary reflectionstationary set-preserving forcing
Cites Work
Cited In (7)
- Increasing u2 by a stationary set preserving forcing
- Rado’s Conjecture and its Baire version
- A variant of Shelah's characterization of Strong Chang's Conjecture
- Chang's conjecture and semiproperness of nonreasonable posets
- Strong Chang’s Conjecture, Semi-Stationary Reflection, the Strong Tree Property and two-cardinal square principles
- Strong downward Löwenheim-Skolem theorems for stationary logics. I
- \(\Pi_2\) consequences of \(\mathsf{BMM}+\mathsf{NS}_{\omega_1}\) is precipitous and the semiproperness of stationary set preserving forcings
This page was built for publication: Rado's conjecture implies that all stationary set preserving forcings are semiproper
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2853979)