The largest H-eigenvalue and spectral radius of Laplacian tensor of non-odd-bipartite generalized power hypergraphs

From MaRDI portal
Publication:286171




Abstract: Let G be a simple graph or hypergraph, and let A(G),L(G),Q(G) be the adjacency, Laplacian and signless Laplacian tensors of G respectively. The largest H-eigenvalues (resp., the spectral radii) of L(G),Q(G) are denoted respectively by lambdamaxL(G),lambdamaxQ(G) (resp., hoL(G),hoQ(G)). For a connected non-bipartite simple graph G, lambdamaxL(G)=hoL(G)<hoQ(G). But this does not hold for non-odd-bipartite hypergraphs. We will investigate this problem by considering a class of generalized power hypergraphs Gk,frack2, which are constructed from simple connected graphs G by blowing up each vertex of G into a frack2-set and preserving the adjacency of vertices. Suppose that G is non-bipartite, or equivalently Gk,frack2 is non-odd-bipartite. We get the following spectral properties: (1) hoL(Gk,kover2)=hoQ(Gk,kover2) if and only if k is a multiple of 4; in this case lambdamaxL(Gk,frack2)<hoL(Gk,kover2). (2) If kequiv2(!!!mod4), then for sufficiently large k, lambdamaxL(Gk,frack2)<hoL(Gk,kover2). Motivated by the study of hypergraphs Gk,frack2, for a connected non-odd-bipartite hypergraph G, we give a characterization of L(G) and Q(G) having the same spectra or the spectrum of A(G) being symmetric with respect to the origin, that is, L(G) and Q(G), or A(G) and A(G) are similar via a complex (necessarily non-real) diagonal matrix with modular-1 diagonal entries. So we give an answer to a question raised by Shao et al., that is, for a non-odd-bipartite hypergraph G, that L(G) and Q(G) have the same spectra can not imply they have the same H-spectra.




Cited in
(20)






This page was built for publication: The largest \(H\)-eigenvalue and spectral radius of Laplacian tensor of non-odd-bipartite generalized power hypergraphs

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q286171)