Sub-additive recursive ``matching noise and biases in risk-weighted index calculation methods in incomplete markets with partially observable multi-attribute preferences
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2864863
Abstract: While Indices, Index tracking funds and ETFs have grown in popularity during then last ten years, there are many structural problems inherent in Index calculation methodologies and the legal/economic structure of ETFs. These problems raise actionable issues of Suitability and fraud under US securities laws, because most Indices and ETFs are misleading, have substantial tracking errors and dont reflect what they are supposed to track. This article contributes to the existing literature by: a) introducing and characterizing the errors and Biases inherent in risk-adjusted index weighting methods and the associated adverse effects; b) showing how these biases/effects inherent in Index calculation methods reduce social welfare, and can form the basis for harmful arbitrage activities.
Recommendations
Cites work
- An economic index of riskiness
- Comparing downside risk measures for heavy tailed distributions
- Further critique of GARCH/ARMA/VAR/EVT Stochastic-Volatility models and related approaches
- Investment volatility: A critique of standard beta estimation and a simple way forward
- On the diversity of equity markets
- Portfolio management without probabilities or statistics
- Recursive smooth ambiguity preferences
- Rethinking Rigor in Calculus: The Role of the Mean Value Theorem
- The exchangeable multinomial model as an approach to testing deterministic axioms of choice and measurement
- WHY THE RETURN NOTION MATTERS
This page was built for publication: Sub-additive recursive ``matching noise and biases in risk-weighted index calculation methods in incomplete markets with partially observable multi-attribute preferences
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2864863)