Side channel analysis of practical pairing implementations: which path is more secure?

DOI10.1007/11958239_7MaRDI QIDQ2876969zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Claire Whelan, Mike Scott

Publication date 21 August 2014

Published in Progress in Cryptology - VIETCRYPT 2006 (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/11958239_7

zbMATH Keywords

Ate pairingTate pairingpairing based cryptographycorrelation power analysis (CPA)\(\eta_T\) pairingside channel analysis (SCA)

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Cryptography (94A60)

Recommendations

• Side Channel Attacks and Countermeasures on Pairing Based Cryptosystems over Binary Fields
• Implementation attacks \& countermeasures
• Side channel attacks against pairing over theta functions
• Failure of the Point Blinding Countermeasure Against Fault Attack in Pairing-Based Cryptography
• A survey of fault attacks in pairing based cryptography

Cited in

(7)

• What about Vulnerability to a Fault Attack of the Miller’s Algorithm During an Identity Based Protocol?
• Side Channel Attacks and Countermeasures on Pairing Based Cryptosystems over Binary Fields
• New versions of Miller-loop secured against side-channel attacks
• The Hidden Root Problem
• A survey of fault attacks in pairing based cryptography
• Implementation attacks \& countermeasures
• Side channel attacks against pairing over theta functions

This page was built for publication: Side channel analysis of practical pairing implementations: which path is more secure?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2876969)