Natural deduction for the Sheffer stroke and Peirce's arrow (and any other truth-functional connective)
DOI10.1007/S10992-015-9370-XzbMATH Open1392.03018arXiv1504.05995OpenAlexW3104357504MaRDI QIDQ288247FDOQ288247
Authors: Richard Zach
Publication date: 25 May 2016
Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.05995
Recommendations
Classical propositional logic (03B05) Proof theory in general (including proof-theoretic semantics) (03F03) Cut-elimination and normal-form theorems (03F05) Abstract deductive systems (03B22)
Cites Work
- Untersuchungen über das logische Schliessen. I
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Gentzen and Jaśkowski natural deduction: fundamentally similar but importantly different
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Natural deduction with general elimination rules
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Concerning formulas of the types A→B ν C,A →(Ex)B(x) in intuitionistic formal systems
- The Stroke Function in Natural Deduction
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (5)
This page was built for publication: Natural deduction for the Sheffer stroke and Peirce's arrow (and any other truth-functional connective)
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q288247)