Playing Mastermind with constant-size memory
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2904783
DOI10.4230/LIPICS.STACS.2012.441zbMATH Open1245.68144arXiv1110.3619OpenAlexW2504769075MaRDI QIDQ2904783FDOQ2904783
Authors: Benjamin Doerr, Carola Winzen
Publication date: 23 August 2012
Abstract: We analyze the classic board game of Mastermind with holes and a constant number of colors. A result of Chv'atal (Combinatorica 3 (1983), 325-329) states that the codebreaker can find the secret code with questions. We show that this bound remains valid if the codebreaker may only store a constant number of guesses and answers. In addition to an intrinsic interest in this question, our result also disproves a conjecture of Droste, Jansen, and Wegener (Theory of Computing Systems 39 (2006), 525-544) on the memory-restricted black-box complexity of the OneMax function class.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3619
Recommendations
Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity (68Q25) Combinatorics in computer science (68R05) 2-person games (91A05)
Cited In (12)
- CONCUR 2005 – Concurrency Theory
- Playing several variants of Mastermind with constant-size memory is not harder than with unbounded memory
- Bounding memory for Mastermind might not make it harder
- On the query complexity of black-peg AB-mastermind
- Toward a unifying framework for evolutionary processes
- Playing mastermind with constant-size memory
- Memory-restricted black-box complexity of OneMax
- The worst case number of questions in generalized AB game with and without white-peg answers
- A framework for co-optimization algorithm performance and its application to worst-case optimization
- Reducing the arity in unbiased black-box complexity
- Unbiasedness of estimation-of-distribution algorithms
- Title not available (Why is that?)
This page was built for publication: Playing Mastermind with constant-size memory
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2904783)