Abstract: In recent years experiments have demonstrated that living cells can measure low chemical concentrations with high precision, and much progress has been made in understanding what sets the fundamental limit to the precision of chemical sensing. Chemical concentration measurements start with the binding of ligand molecules to receptor proteins, which is an inherently noisy process, especially at low concentrations. The signaling networks that transmit the information on the ligand concentration from the receptors into the cell have to filter this noise extrinsic to the cell as much as possible. These networks, however, are also stochastic in nature, which means that they will also add noise to the transmitted signal. In this review, we will first discuss how the diffusive transport and binding of ligand to the receptor sets the receptor correlation time, and then how downstream signaling pathways integrate the noise in the receptor state; we will discuss how the number of receptors, the receptor correlation time, and the effective integration time together set a fundamental limit on the precision of sensing. We then discuss how cells can remove the receptor noise while simultaneously suppressing the intrinsic noise in the signaling network. We describe why this mechanism of time integration requires three classes of resources---receptors and their integration time, readout molecules, energy---and how each resource class sets a fundamental sensing limit. We also briefly discuss the scheme of maximum-likelihood estimation, the role of receptor cooperativity, and how cellular copy protocols differ from canonical copy protocols typically considered in the computational literature, explaining why cellular sensing systems can never reach the Landauer limit on the optimal trade-off between accuracy and energetic cost.
Recommendations
- Know the single-receptor sensing limit? Think again
- On signalling and estimation limits for molecular birth-processes
- Decisions on the fly in cellular sensory systems
- Efficiency of cellular information processing
- Noise filtering strategies in adaptive biochemical signaling networks. Application to E. Coli chemotaxis
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 107482 (Why is no real title available?)
- Active transport improves the precision of linear long distance molecular signalling
- An introduction to systems biology. Design principles of biological circuits.
- Efficiency of cellular information processing
- Irreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process
- Length of time's arrow
- Positional information, in bits
- The Role of Receptor Occupancy Noise in Eukaryotic Chemotaxis
Cited in
(8)- Know the single-receptor sensing limit? Think again
- On signalling and estimation limits for molecular birth-processes
- Diffusion limited immunochemical sensing
- Nonequilibrium sensing and its analogy to kinetic proofreading
- Prediction and dissipation in nonequilibrium molecular sensors: conditionally Markovian channels driven by memoryful environments
- Thermodynamic limits to information harvesting by sensory systems
- Decisions on the fly in cellular sensory systems
- What we learn from the learning rate
This page was built for publication: Fundamental limits to cellular sensing
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q290504)
