When Do Latent Class Models Overstate Accuracy for Diagnostic and Other Classifiers in the Absence of a Gold Standard?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2912354
DOI10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01694.xzbMath1274.92028WikidataQ37849985 ScholiaQ37849985MaRDI QIDQ2912354
Publication date: 14 September 2012
Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01694.x
62P10: Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
92C50: Medical applications (general)
Related Items
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotone latent variable models
- Nonparametric estimation of component distributions in a multivariate mixture
- Latent Class Modeling Approaches for Assessing Diagnostic Error without a Gold Standard: With Applications to p53 Immunohistochemical Assays in Bladder Tumors
- A Cautionary Note on the Robustness of Latent Class Models for Estimating Diagnostic Error without a Gold Standard
- Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance
- Estimating the Error Rates of Diagnostic Tests
- A Biomedical Application of Latent Class Models with Random Effects
- Random Effects Models in Latent Class Analysis for Evaluating Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests
- Latent Variable Modeling of Diagnostic Accuracy
- Using Latent Class Models to Characterize and Assess Relative Error in Discrete Measurements
- "Cost-Utility" as a Measure of the Efficiency of a Test
- A Probit Latent Class Model with General Correlation Structures for Evaluating Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests