Covers of acts over monoids and pure epimorphisms.

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2921037

DOI10.1017/S0013091513000618zbMATH Open1309.20053arXiv1206.3095OpenAlexW2963851160MaRDI QIDQ2921037FDOQ2921037


Authors: Alex Bailey, James H. Renshaw Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 30 September 2014

Published in: Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society. Series II (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In 2001 Enoch's celebrated flat cover conjecture was finally proven and the proofs (two different proofs were presented in the same paper [4]) have since generated a great deal of interest among researchers. In particular the results have been recast in a number of other categories and in particular for additive categories (see for example [2], [3], [22] and [23]). In 2008, Mahmoudi and Renshaw considered a similar problem for acts over monoids but used a slightly different definition of cover. They proved that in general their definition was not equivalent to Enoch's, except in the projective case, and left open a number of questions regarding the `other' definition. This `other' definition is the subject of the present paper and we attempt to emulate some of Enoch's work to the category of acts over monoids and concentrate in the main on strongly flat acts. We hope to extend this work to other classes of acts, such as injective, torsion free, divisible and free, in a future report.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3095




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (20)





This page was built for publication: Covers of acts over monoids and pure epimorphisms.

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2921037)