Asynchronous exclusive selection

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2934360

DOI10.1145/1400751.1400801zbMATH Open1301.68125arXiv1512.09314OpenAlexW2021785007MaRDI QIDQ2934360FDOQ2934360


Authors: Bogdan S. Chlebus, Dariusz R. Kowalski Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 12 December 2014

Published in: Proceedings of the twenty-seventh ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We consider the task of assigning unique integers to a group of processes in an asynchronous distributed system of a total of n processes prone to crashes that communicate through shared read-write registers. In the Renaming problem, an arbitrary group of klen processes that hold the original names from a range [N]=1,ldots,N, contend to acquire unique integers in a smaller range [M] as new names using some r auxiliary shared registers. We give number of wait-free renaming algorithms, in particular an adaptive one having M=8klgk1 as a bound on the range of new names that operates in O(k) local steps and uses r=O(n2) registers. As a lower bound, we show that a wait-free solution to Renaming requires 1+mink2,lfloorlog2rfracNM+k1floor steps in the worst case. We apply renaming algorithms to obtain solutions to Store&Collect problem, which is about a group of klen processes with the original names in a range [N] proposing individual values (operation Store) and returning a view of all proposed values (operation Collect), while using some r auxiliary shared read-write registers. We consider a problem Mining-Names, in which processes may repeatedly request positive integers as new names subject to the constraints that no integer can be assigned to different processes and the number of integers never acquired as names is finite in an infinite execution. We give two solutions to Mining-Names in a distributed system in which there are infinitely many shared read-write registers available. A non-blocking solution leaves at most 2n2 nonnegative integers never assigned as names, and a wait-free algorithm leaves at most (n+2)(n1) nonnegative integers never assigned as names.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.09314




Recommendations





Cited In (9)





This page was built for publication: Asynchronous exclusive selection

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2934360)