Integrability versus non-integrability: hard hexagons and hard squares compared

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2936375

DOI10.1088/1751-8113/47/44/445001zbMATH Open1316.82008arXiv1406.5566OpenAlexW2099290029WikidataQ58082095 ScholiaQ58082095MaRDI QIDQ2936375FDOQ2936375


Authors: M. Assis, Jesper Lykke Jacobsen, I. Jensen, Jean-Marie Maillard, Barry M. McCoy Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 16 December 2014

Published in: Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In this paper we compare the integrable hard hexagon model with the non-integrable hard squares model by means of partition function roots and transfer matrix eigenvalues. We consider partition functions for toroidal, cylindrical, and free-free boundary conditions up to sizes 40imes40 and transfer matrices up to 30 sites. For all boundary conditions the hard squares roots are seen to lie in a bounded area of the complex fugacity plane along with the universal hard core line segment on the negative real fugacity axis. The density of roots on this line segment matches the derivative of the phase difference between the eigenvalues of largest (and equal) moduli and exhibits much greater structure than the corresponding density of hard hexagons. We also study the special point z=1 of hard squares where all eigenvalues have unit modulus, and we give several conjectures for the value at z=1 of the partition functions.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5566




Recommendations





Cited In (6)





This page was built for publication: Integrability versus non-integrability: hard hexagons and hard squares compared

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2936375)