Integrability versus non-integrability: hard hexagons and hard squares compared

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2936375




Abstract: In this paper we compare the integrable hard hexagon model with the non-integrable hard squares model by means of partition function roots and transfer matrix eigenvalues. We consider partition functions for toroidal, cylindrical, and free-free boundary conditions up to sizes 40imes40 and transfer matrices up to 30 sites. For all boundary conditions the hard squares roots are seen to lie in a bounded area of the complex fugacity plane along with the universal hard core line segment on the negative real fugacity axis. The density of roots on this line segment matches the derivative of the phase difference between the eigenvalues of largest (and equal) moduli and exhibits much greater structure than the corresponding density of hard hexagons. We also study the special point z=1 of hard squares where all eigenvalues have unit modulus, and we give several conjectures for the value at z=1 of the partition functions.









This page was built for publication: Integrability versus non-integrability: hard hexagons and hard squares compared

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2936375)