Is the missing axiom of matroid theory lost forever?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2939482
Abstract: We conjecture that it is not possible to finitely axiomatize matroid representability in monadic second-order logic for matroids, and we describe some partial progress towards this conjecture. We present a collection of sentences in monadic second-order logic and show that it is possible to finitely axiomatize matroids using only sentences in this collection. Moreover, we can also axiomatize representability over any fixed finite field (assuming Rota's conjecture holds). We prove that it is not possible to finitely axiomatize representability, or representability over any fixed infinite field, using sentences from the collection.
Recommendations
Cited In (9)
- On axiomatizability of the class of finitary matroids and decidability of their universal theory
- Yes, the ``missing axiom of matroid theory is lost forever
- The geometry of gaussoids
- Excluded minors for matroids satisfying Kinser's inequalities
- On the number of matroids
- Rota’s Conjecture, the Missing Axiom, and Prime Cycles in Toric Varieties
- Combinatorics and Hodge theory
- Matroid Theory for Algebraic Geometers
- Positively oriented matroids are realizable
This page was built for publication: Is the missing axiom of matroid theory lost forever?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2939482)