AN ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON PROJECTIVITY OF MODULES

DOI10.1017/S0017089514000135zbMATH Open1320.16002arXiv1206.5556MaRDI QIDQ2940229FDOQ2940229

Author name not available (Why is that?), Chris Holston, Joseph Mastromatteo, Sergio R. López-Permouth

Publication date: 26 January 2015

Published in: Glasgow Mathematical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Similar to the idea of relative projectivity, we introduce the notion of relative subprojectivity, which is an alternative way to measure the projectivity of a module. Given modules $M$ and $N$, $M$ is said to be {em $N$-subprojective} if for every epimorphism $g:BightarrowN$ and homomorphism $f:MightarrowN$, then there exists a homomorphism $h:MightarrowB$ such that $gh=f$. For a module $M$, the {em subprojectivity domain of $M$} is defined to be the collection of all modules $N$ such that $M$ is $N$-subprojective. A module is projective if and only if its subprojectivity domain consists of all modules. Opposite to this idea, a module $M$ is said to be {em subprojectively poor}, or {em $sp$-poor} if its subprojectivity domain is as small as conceivably possible, that is, consisting of exactly the projective modules. Properties of subprojectivity domains and $sp$-poor modules are studied. In particular, the existence of an $sp$-poor module is attained for artinian serial rings.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5556

zbMATH Keywords

perfect ringscoherent ringsrelative projective modulessemi-primary ringssubprojective modulesgeneralizations of projectivity

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Free, projective, and flat modules and ideals in associative algebras (16D40)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Characterizing rings in terms of the extent of the injectivity and projectivity of their modules.
• POOR MODULES: THE OPPOSITE OF INJECTIVITY
• Rings whose modules have maximal or minimal injectivity domains.
• Abelian groups without elements of finite order
• Rings whose modules have maximal or minimal projectivity domain.
• An alternative perspective on injectivity of modules.
• Soc-Injective Rings and Modules*

Cited In (21)

• On the weak-injectivity profile of a ring
• On minimal absolutely pure domain of RD-flat modules
• Subprojectivity domains of pure-projective modules
• Precover completing domains and approximations
• On subinjectivity domains of RD-injective modules
• Flat-precover completing domains
• On subinjectivity domains of pure-injective modules
• On subprojectivity domains of g-semiartinian modules
• The opposite of injectivity by proper classes
• The opposite of projectivity by proper classes
• Rugged modules: The opposite of flatness
• A new approach to projectivity in the categories of complexes
• Rings whose modules have maximal or minimal subprojectivity domain
• Max-projective modules
• The isomorphism problem for basic modules and the divisibility profile of the algebra of polynomials
• Rings with singular modules having a restricted subprojectivity domain
• An alternative perspective on pure-projectivity of modules
• A new approach to projectivity in the categories of complexes. II
• Subprojectivity in abelian categories
• RD-projective module whose subprojectivity domain is minimal
• On projectivity of finitely generated modules

This page was built for publication: AN ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON PROJECTIVITY OF MODULES

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2940229)