Would real analysis be complete without the fundamental theorem of calculus?

DOI10.4171/EM/291zbMATH Open1347.26007OpenAlexW2963518195MaRDI QIDQ294076FDOQ294076

Authors: Michael Deveau, Holger Teismann 

Publication date: 9 June 2016

Published in: Elemente der Mathematik (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://www.ems-ph.org/journals/show_pdf.php?vol=70&iss=4&issn=0013-6018&rank=4

Recommendations

• Completion of \(\mathbb{R}\)\dots for the order
• Real analysis in reverse
• \(72+42\): characterizations of the completeness and Archimedean properties of ordered fields
• Toward a more complete list of completeness axioms
• Why there is no ``Fundamental theorem of calculus for the Riemann integral

zbMATH Keywords

completenessfundamental theorems calculusPropp function

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

One-variable calculus (26A06) Integrals of Riemann, Stieltjes and Lebesgue type (26A42) Foundations: limits and generalizations, elementary topology of the line (26A03)

Cited In (3)

• Completion of \(\mathbb{R}\)\dots for the order
• Completeness of ordered fields and a trio of classical series tests
• Real analysis in reverse

This page was built for publication: Would real analysis be complete without the fundamental theorem of calculus?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q294076)