Would real analysis be complete without the fundamental theorem of calculus?

DOI10.4171/EM/291MaRDI QIDQ294076zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Michael Deveau, Holger Teismann

Publication date 9 June 2016

Published in Elemente der Mathematik (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://www.ems-ph.org/journals/show_pdf.php?vol=70&iss=4&issn=0013-6018&rank=4

zbMATH Keywords

completenessfundamental theorems calculusPropp function

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Foundations: limits and generalizations, elementary topology of the line (26A03) One-variable calculus (26A06) Integrals of Riemann, Stieltjes and Lebesgue type (26A42)

Recommendations

• Completion of \(\mathbb{R}\)\dots for the order
• Real analysis in reverse
• \(72+42\): characterizations of the completeness and Archimedean properties of ordered fields
• Toward a more complete list of completeness axioms
• Why there is no ``Fundamental theorem of calculus for the Riemann integral

Cited in

(3)

• Completeness of ordered fields and a trio of classical series tests
• Real analysis in reverse
• Completion of \(\mathbb{R}\)\dots for the order

This page was built for publication: Would real analysis be complete without the fundamental theorem of calculus?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q294076)