Context semantics, linear logic, and computational complexity
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:2946582)
Abstract: We show that context semantics can be fruitfully applied to the quantitative analysis of proof normalization in linear logic. In particular, context semantics lets us define the weight of a proof-net as a measure of its inherent complexity: it is both an upper bound to normalization time (modulo a polynomial overhead, independently on the reduction strategy) and a lower bound to the number of steps to normal form (for certain reduction strategies). Weights are then exploited in proving strong soundness theorems for various subsystems of linear logic, namely elementary linear logic, soft linear logic and light linear logic.
Recommendations
Cited in
(14)- The computational complexity of ideal semantics
- Paths-based criteria and application to linear logic subsystems characterizing polynomial time
- Characterizing polynomial and exponential complexity classes in elementary lambda-calculus
- Polynomial time in untyped elementary linear logic
- Linear dependent types in a call-by-value scenario
- On paths-based criteria for polynomial time complexity in proof-nets
- Quantitative Game Semantics for Linear Logic
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1954368 (Why is no real title available?)
- Geometry of resource interaction and Taylor-Ehrhard-Regnier expansion: \textit{a minimalist approach}
- Geometry of resource interaction -- \textit{a minimalist approach}
- Is the Optimal Implementation Inefficient? Elementarily Not
- Context-Sensitive Languages, Rational Graphs and Determinism
- Towards a geometry of recursion
- Implicit computation complexity in higher-order programming languages
This page was built for publication: Context semantics, linear logic, and computational complexity
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2946582)