Context semantics, linear logic, and computational complexity
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2946582
Abstract: We show that context semantics can be fruitfully applied to the quantitative analysis of proof normalization in linear logic. In particular, context semantics lets us define the weight of a proof-net as a measure of its inherent complexity: it is both an upper bound to normalization time (modulo a polynomial overhead, independently on the reduction strategy) and a lower bound to the number of steps to normal form (for certain reduction strategies). Weights are then exploited in proving strong soundness theorems for various subsystems of linear logic, namely elementary linear logic, soft linear logic and light linear logic.
Recommendations
Cited in
(14)- Towards a geometry of recursion
- Polynomial time in untyped elementary linear logic
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1954368 (Why is no real title available?)
- Context-Sensitive Languages, Rational Graphs and Determinism
- The computational complexity of ideal semantics
- Linear dependent types in a call-by-value scenario
- Implicit computation complexity in higher-order programming languages
- Characterizing polynomial and exponential complexity classes in elementary lambda-calculus
- Paths-based criteria and application to linear logic subsystems characterizing polynomial time
- On paths-based criteria for polynomial time complexity in proof-nets
- Is the Optimal Implementation Inefficient? Elementarily Not
- Quantitative Game Semantics for Linear Logic
- Geometry of resource interaction and Taylor-Ehrhard-Regnier expansion: \textit{a minimalist approach}
- Geometry of resource interaction -- \textit{a minimalist approach}
This page was built for publication: Context semantics, linear logic, and computational complexity
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2946582)