Comparison of strategies when building linear prediction models.

DOI10.1002/NLA.1916zbMATH Open1340.62066OpenAlexW2121361281MaRDI QIDQ2948073FDOQ2948073

Authors: Rolf H. H. Groenwold, S. Teerenstra, Wiebe Pestman 

Publication date: 29 September 2015

Published in: Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nla.1916

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4028661
• Linear Model Selection by Cross-Validation
• Cross-Validation of Regression Models
• Improvements on Cross-Validation: The .632+ Bootstrap Method
• Post-hoc analyses in multiple regression based on prediction error

zbMATH Keywords

shrinkagelinear regressionprediction errormodel building strategiesprecision ratiovictory rate

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Linear regression; mixed models (62J05) Ridge regression; shrinkage estimators (Lasso) (62J07)

Cites Work

• Regression modeling strategies. With applications to linear models, logistic regression and survival analysis
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Clinical prediction models. A practical approach to development, validation, and updating.
• Asymptotics for and against cross-validation
• Cross-Validation of Regression Models
• Mathematical statistics.
• Shrinkage and Penalized Likelihood as Methods to Improve Predictive Accuracy
• Creating and classifying measures of linear association by optimization techniques

Cited In (1)

• Post-hoc analyses in multiple regression based on prediction error

Uses Software

• Scilab

This page was built for publication: Comparison of strategies when building linear prediction models.

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2948073)