Why condensation by compression in pure water vapor cannot occur in an approach based on Euler equations

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2950802

DOI10.1090/QAM/1393zbMATH Open1327.35307arXiv1406.1377OpenAlexW1877248506MaRDI QIDQ2950802FDOQ2950802


Authors: Maren Hantke, Ferdinand Thein Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 9 October 2015

Published in: Quarterly of Applied Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Phase transitions are in the focus of the modeling of multiphase flows. A large number of models is available to describe such processes. We consider several different two phase models that are based on the Euler equations of compressible fluid flows and which take into account phase transitions between a liquid phase and its vapor. Especially we consider the flow of liquid water and water vapor. We give a mathematical proof, that all these models are not able to describe the process of condensation by compression. This behavior is in agreement with observations in experiments, that simulate adiabatic flows, and shows that the Euler equations give a fairly good description of the process. The mathematical proof is valid for the official standard {em IAPWS-IF97} for water and for any other good equation of state. Also the opposite case of expanding the liquid phase will be discussed.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.1377




Recommendations



Cites Work


Cited In (4)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Why condensation by compression in pure water vapor cannot occur in an approach based on Euler equations

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2950802)