Comparative Study of Different Penalty Functions and Algorithms in Survey Calibration

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-29975-4_6zbMath1357.62040OpenAlexW2548907098MaRDI QIDQ2958616

Anatoly A. Zhigljavsky, Jonathan Gillard, Gareth T. Davies

Publication date: 3 February 2017

Published in: Advances in Stochastic and Deterministic Global Optimization (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29975-4_6

zbMATH Keywords

optimizationsurvey calibration\(g\)-weights

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05)

Uses Software

• sampling
• Survey
• GES
• Bascula
• CALMAR2
• g-CALIB
• ReGenesees

Cites Work

• P-algorithm based on a simplicial statistical model of multimodal functions
• Another look at ridge calibration
• Branch and bound algorithm for multidimensional scaling with city-block metric
• A review of statistical models for global optimization
• A successive projection method
• A class of test functions for global optimization
• Model assisted survey sampling.
• On similarities between two models of global optimization: Statistical models and radial basis functions
• Stochastic global optimization.
• Generalized Raking Procedures in Survey Sampling
• Multipurpose Estimation from Unbalanced Samples
• Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling
• Historical Development of the Newton–Raphson Method
• A statistical model-based algorithm for ‘black-box’ multi-objective optimisation
• Calibration in Survey Sampling as an Optimization Problem
• A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement From a Finite Universe