Aligning statistical and scientific reasoning: misunderstanding and misuse of statistical significance impede science

DOI10.1126/SCIENCE.AAF5406MaRDI QIDQ2961673zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Steven N. Goodman

Publication date 15 February 2017

Published in Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5406

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5851866
• A holistic approach to empirical analysis: the insignificance of \(P\), hypothesis testing and statistical significance
• Statistical concepts in philosophy of science
• Does the Statistics Profession Have an Identity Crisis?
• Bernoulli's Fallacy

Cited in

(5)

• Likelihood, Replicability and Robbins' Confidence Sequences
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5851866 (Why is no real title available?)
• Moving Towards the Post p < 0.05 Era via the Analysis of Credibility
• How redefining statistical significance can worsen the replication crisis
• Connecting simple and precise P‐values to complex and ambiguous realities (includes rejoinder to comments on “Divergence vs. decision P‐values”)

This page was built for publication: Aligning statistical and scientific reasoning: misunderstanding and misuse of statistical significance impede science

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2961673)