Tail risk constraints and maximum entropy

From MaRDI portal
Publication:296373

DOI10.3390/E17063724zbMATH Open1338.62023DBLPjournals/entropy/GemanGT15arXiv1412.7647OpenAlexW1506373683WikidataQ56456020 ScholiaQ56456020MaRDI QIDQ296373FDOQ296373


Authors: Donald Geman, Helyette Geman, Nassim Nicholas Taleb Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 15 June 2016

Published in: Entropy (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In the world of modern financial theory, portfolio construction has traditionally operated under at least one of two central assumptions: the constraints are derived from a utility function and/or the multivariate probability distribution of the underlying asset returns is fully known. In practice, both the performance criteria and the informational structure are markedly different: risk-taking agents are mandated to build portfolios by primarily constraining the tails of the portfolio return to satisfy VaR, stress testing, or expected shortfall (CVaR) conditions, and are largely ignorant about the remaining properties of the probability distributions. As an alternative, we derive the shape of portfolio distributions which have maximum entropy subject to real-world left-tail constraints and other expectations. Two consequences are (i) the left-tail constraints are sufficiently powerful to overide other considerations in the conventional theory, rendering individual portfolio components of limited relevance; and (ii) the "barbell" payoff (maximal certainty/low risk on one side, maximum uncertainty on the other) emerges naturally from this construction.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.7647






Cites Work


Cited In (1)





This page was built for publication: Tail risk constraints and maximum entropy

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q296373)