An intelligent decomposition of pairwise comparison matrices for large-scale decisions

DOI10.1016/j.ejor.2014.03.032zbMath1338.91054OpenAlexW2010040208MaRDI QIDQ296743

Teresa Wu, Dan Shunk, Eugene Rex Jalao

Publication date: 23 June 2016

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.03.032

zbMATH Keywords

AHPinconsistencypairwise comparison matricesANPbinary integer programming

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Integer programming (90C10)

Related Items (8)

Multi-criteria group decision making based on bilateral agreements ⋮ Consistent clustering of entries in large pairwise comparison matrices ⋮ Jie Ke versus AlphaGo: a ranking approach using decision making method for large-scale data with incomplete information ⋮ Identifying critical factors in systems with interrelated components: a method considering heterogeneous influence and strength attenuation ⋮ Hierarchical clustering of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy relations and its application to elicit criteria weights in MCDM problems ⋮ Estimation of Consistency of Fuzzy Pairwise Comparison Matrices using a Defuzzification Method ⋮ Deriving priorities from inconsistent PCM using network algorithms ⋮ Analytic network process: an overview of applications

Cites Work

• Balancing consistency and expert judgment in AHP
• A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP
• Achieving matrix consistency in AHP through linearization
• How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process
• Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks
• An incomplete design in the analytic hierarchy process
• A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures
• A Monte Carlo investigation of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices in AHP
• Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary
• Linear programming based decomposition approach in evaluating priorities from pairwise comparisons and error analysis
• Alternative modes of questioning in the analytic hierarchy process
• Analysis of AHP by BIBD
• A MIN–MAX GOAL PROGRAMMING APPROACH TO PRIORITY DERIVATION IN AHP WITH INTERVAL JUDGEMENTS
• Clusters and pivots for evaluating a large numberof alternatives in AHP
• Multi-criteria decision making methods. A comparative study

This page was built for publication: An intelligent decomposition of pairwise comparison matrices for large-scale decisions