A synergy of multicriteria techniques to assess additive value models
From MaRDI portal
Publication:296799
DOI10.1016/J.EJOR.2014.03.047zbMATH Open1338.91053OpenAlexW2038741251MaRDI QIDQ296799FDOQ296799
Recommendations
- Robustness of Additive Value Function Methods in MCDM
- ACUTA: a novel method for eliciting additive value functions on the basis of holistic preference statements
- Applications of the MACBETH Approach in the Framework of an Additive Aggregation Model
- Interactive Utility Assessment in Multicriteria Decision Analysis Using Implicit Trade-off Information
- Assessing non-additive utility for multicriteria decision aid
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3616126 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2209460 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2209465 (Why is no real title available?)
- A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP
- A way to deal with fuzzy preferences in multi-criteria decision problems
- ACUTA: a novel method for eliciting additive value functions on the basis of holistic preference statements
- Applications of the MACBETH Approach in the Framework of an Additive Aggregation Model
- Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision- making, the UTA method
- Building a set of additive value functions representing a reference preorder and intensities of preference: GRIP method
- Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation
- MACBETH — An interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions
- Multiple criteria decision analysis. State of the art surveys
- Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions
- Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience.
- Robust ordinal regression
- Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking
- Robustness in operational research and decision aiding: a multi-faceted issue
- Selection of a representative value function in robust multiple criteria ranking and choice
- State of the Art—Utility Assessment Methods
- Using artificial intelligence and visual techniques into preference disaggregation analysis: The MIIDAS system
Cited in
(6)- Building the additive utility functions for CAD-UFRJ evaluation staff criteria
- Assessing non-additive utility for multicriteria decision aid
- Elicitation of criteria importance weights through the Simos method: a robustness concern
- Title not available (Why is no real title available?)
- A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff
- Heuristics for selecting pair-wise elicitation questions in multiple criteria choice problems
This page was built for publication: A synergy of multicriteria techniques to assess additive value models
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q296799)
