On splits of computably enumerable sets
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2970977
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-50062-1_31zbMATH Open1477.03162arXiv1605.03034OpenAlexW2963763495MaRDI QIDQ2970977FDOQ2970977
Authors: Peter A. Cholak
Publication date: 4 April 2017
Published in: Computability and Complexity (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: Our focus will be on the computably enumerable (c.e.) sets and trivial, non-trivial, Friedberg, and non-Friedberg splits of the c.e. sets. Every non-computable set has a non-trivial Friedberg split. Moreover, this theorem is uniform. V. Yu. Shavrukov recently answered the question which c.e. sets have a non-trivial non-Friedberg splitting and we provide a different proof of his result. We end by showing there is no uniform splitting of all c.e. sets such that all non-computable sets are non-trivially split and, in addition, all sets with a non-trivial non-Friedberg split are split accordingly.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.03034
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Three theorems on recursive enumeration. I. Decomposition. II. Maximal set. III. Enumeration without duplication
- Automorphisms of the lattice of recursively enumerable sets: Orbits
- Diagonals and semihyperhypersimple sets
- Diagonals and -maximal sets
- \(\mathcal{D}\)-maximal sets
- Recursion, metarecursion, and inclusion
- Some orbits for \({\mathcal E}\)
- Friedberg splittings in Σ30 quotient lattices of
Cited In (4)
This page was built for publication: On splits of computably enumerable sets
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2970977)