Erasure/List Random Coding Error Exponents Are Not Universally Achievable
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2976552
DOI10.1109/TIT.2016.2598350zbMATH Open1359.94417arXiv1410.7005OpenAlexW2547729694MaRDI QIDQ2976552FDOQ2976552
Wasim Huleihel, Neri Merhav, Nir Weinberger
Publication date: 28 April 2017
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: We study the problem of universal decoding for unknown discrete memoryless channels in the presence of erasure/list option at the decoder, in the random coding regime. Specifically, we harness a universal version of Forney's classical erasure/list decoder developed in earlier studies, which is based on the competitive minimax methodology, and guarantees universal achievability of a certain fraction of the optimum random coding error exponents. In this paper, we derive an exact single-letter expression for the maximum achievable fraction. Examples are given in which the maximal achievable fraction is strictly less than unity, which imply that, in general, there is no universal erasure/list decoder which achieves the same random coding error exponents as the optimal decoder for a known channel. This is in contrast to the situation in ordinary decoding (without the erasure/list option), where optimum exponents are universally achievable, as is well known. It is also demonstrated that previous lower bounds derived for the maximal achievable fraction are not tight in general. We then analyze a generalized random coding ensemble which incorporate a training sequence, in conjunction with a suboptimal practical decoder ("plug-in" decoder), which first estimates the channel using the known training sequence, and then decodes the remaining symbols of the codeword using the estimated channel. One of the implications of our results, is setting the stage for a reasonable criterion of optimal training. Finally, we compare the performance of the "plug-in" decoder and the universal decoder, in terms of the achievable error exponents, and show that the latter is noticeably better than the former.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.7005
Source coding (94A29) Coding and information theory (compaction, compression, models of communication, encoding schemes, etc.) (aspects in computer science) (68P30)
Recommendations
- Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎
- Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎
- List decoding from erasures: bounds and code constructions 👍 👎
- Limits to List Decoding of Random Codes 👍 👎
- List Decoding—Random Coding Exponents and Expurgated Exponents 👍 👎
- Erasure/List Exponents for Slepian–Wolf Decoding 👍 👎
- Error Exponents of Erasure/List Decoding Revisited Via Moments of Distance Enumerators 👍 👎
- A Neyman–Pearson Approach to Universal Erasure and List Decoding 👍 👎
- Exact Random Coding Exponents for Erasure Decoding 👍 👎
- Achievable Error Exponents for Channels With Side Information—Erasure and List Decoding 👍 👎
This page was built for publication: Erasure/List Random Coding Error Exponents Are Not Universally Achievable
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2976552)