-PURITY VERSUS LOG CANONICITY FOR POLYNOMIALS
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2978867
DOI10.1017/nmj.2016.14zbMath1362.13008arXiv1112.2423OpenAlexW2962909347MaRDI QIDQ2978867
Publication date: 2 May 2017
Published in: Nagoya Mathematical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.2423
Singularities in algebraic geometry (14B05) Characteristic (p) methods (Frobenius endomorphism) and reduction to characteristic (p); tight closure (13A35)
Related Items (7)
Lower bounds on the F-pure threshold and extremal singularities ⋮ Legendre polynomials roots and the \(F\)-pure threshold of bivariate forms ⋮ $F$-singularities: applications of characteristic $p$ methods to singularity theory ⋮ Values of the F‐pure threshold for homogeneous polynomials ⋮ $F$-pure thresholds of binomial hypersurfaces ⋮ An elementary computation of the \(F\)-pure threshold of an elliptic curve ⋮ Quantifying singularities with differential operators
Cites Work
- Log canonical thresholds of binomial ideals
- Discreteness and rationality of \(F\)-thresholds
- \(F\)-pure thresholds and \(F\)-jumping exponents in dimension two
- Generalized test ideals, sharp \(F\)-purity, and sharp test elements
- The purity of the Frobenius and local cohomology
- F-singularities of pairs and inversion of adjunction of arbitrary codimension
- On F-pure thresholds
- \(F\)-purity of hypersurfaces
- The multiplier ideal is a universal test ideal
- Multiplier ideals of monomial ideals
- $F$-thresholds of hypersurfaces
- F-regular and F-pure rings vs. log terminal and log canonical singularities
- A generalization of tight closure and multiplier ideals
- Measuring Singularities with Frobenius: The Basics
- $F$-pure thresholds of binomial hypersurfaces
- $F$-invariants of diagonal hypersurfaces
This page was built for publication: -PURITY VERSUS LOG CANONICITY FOR POLYNOMIALS