On the comparison of Horvitz–Thompson and Murthy's sampling strategies for estimating finite population proportions in direct and randomized response surveys

DOI10.1080/03610926.2015.1019149zbMath1366.62027OpenAlexW2332379989MaRDI QIDQ2979617

No author found.

Publication date: 25 April 2017

Published in: Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2015.1019149

zbMATH Keywords

randomized responsesampling strategyunequal probability samplingpopulation proportionsuper-population modeldirect responsemodel expected variance

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• A generalized randomized response technique
• Indirect Questioning in Sample Surveys
• Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias
• An alternative randomized response procedure
• Asking sensitive questions indirectly
• A New Model for Randomized Response

This page was built for publication: On the comparison of Horvitz–Thompson and Murthy's sampling strategies for estimating finite population proportions in direct and randomized response surveys