There is No Self-Dual \BBZ _{4}-Linear Code Whose Gray Image Has the Parameters (72,2³⁶,16)
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2989181
DOI10.1109/TIT.2013.2246816zbMATH Open1364.94613OpenAlexW1624154989MaRDI QIDQ2989181FDOQ2989181
Publication date: 8 June 2017
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2013.2246816
Recommendations
- The Automorphism Group of a Self-Dual <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="TeX">$[{72,36,16}]$ </tex-math></inline-formula> Code Does Not Contain <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="TeX">$Z_{4}$ </tex-math></i
- There is no \([24,12,9]\) doubly-even self-dual code over \(\mathbb F_4\)
- New Upper Bounds on Binary Linear Codes and a $ {\mathbb Z}_{4}$ -Code With a Better-Than-Linear Gray Image
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5151931
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 786186
- An extremal \([72,36,16]\) binary code has no automorphism group containing \(Z_2 \times Z_4\), \(Q_8\), or \(Z_{10}\)
- Codes over \(\mathbb{Z}_{2^k}\), Gray map and self-dual codes
- All self-dual Z/sub 4/ codes of length 15 or less are known
- Is there a (72,36) d = 16 self-dual code? (Corresp.)
- There exists no self-dual \([24,12,10]\) code over \(\mathbb{F}_5\)
Cited In (4)
This page was built for publication: There is No Self-Dual $ \BBZ _{4}$-Linear Code Whose Gray Image Has the Parameters $(72,2^{36},16)$
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2989181)