On the Fundamental Limits of Adaptive Sensing

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2989475

DOI10.1109/TIT.2012.2215837zbMATH Open1364.94106arXiv1111.4646OpenAlexW2161610387MaRDI QIDQ2989475FDOQ2989475


Authors: Ery Arias-Castro, Emmanuel J. Candès, Mark A. Davenport Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 8 June 2017

Published in: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Suppose we can sequentially acquire arbitrary linear measurements of an n-dimensional vector x resulting in the linear model y = Ax + z, where z represents measurement noise. If the signal is known to be sparse, one would expect the following folk theorem to be true: choosing an adaptive strategy which cleverly selects the next row of A based on what has been previously observed should do far better than a nonadaptive strategy which sets the rows of A ahead of time, thus not trying to learn anything about the signal in between observations. This paper shows that the folk theorem is false. We prove that the advantages offered by clever adaptive strategies and sophisticated estimation procedures---no matter how intractable---over classical compressed acquisition/recovery schemes are, in general, minimal.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.4646




Recommendations




Cited In (5)





This page was built for publication: On the Fundamental Limits of Adaptive Sensing

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2989475)