Extreme point-based multi-attribute decision analysis with incomplete information
From MaRDI portal
Publication:300051
DOI10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.037zbMath1338.90195OpenAlexW2041801243MaRDI QIDQ300051
Publication date: 23 June 2016
Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.037
extreme pointschange of variablesincomplete attribute valuesincomplete attribute weightsmultiple attribute decision-making
Decision theory (91B06) Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Markov and semi-Markov decision processes (90C40)
Related Items (4)
Volume‐based ranking method for a ranked voting system ⋮ Multiple attribute decision making based on cross-evaluation with uncertain decision parameters ⋮ Risk decision-making method using interval numbers and its application based on the prospect value with multiple reference points ⋮ Reference-dependent aggregation in multi-attribute group decision-making
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- An elementary proof of Paelinck's theorem on the convex hull of ranked criterion weights
- Simple procedures of choice in multicriteria problems without precise information about the alternatives' values
- Decision making with incomplete information
- Multi-criteria analysis with partial information about the weighting coefficients
- Decision theory and strict ranking of probabilities
- Multi-attribute decision aid under incomplete information and hierarchical structure
- Dominance, potential optimality, imprecise information, and hierarchical structure in multi-criteria analysis
- Interactive group decision making procedure under incomplete information
- Comparing methods for multiattribute decision making with ordinal weights
- Monte Carlo simulation techniques for group decision making with incomplete information
- Ranking with Partial Information: A Method and an Application
- Preference Assessment by Imprecise Ratio Statements
- An extreme-point approach for obtaining weighted ratings in qualitative multicriteria decision making
- Establishing Dominance in Multiattribute Decision Making Using an Ordered Metric Method
- Dominance, potential optimality and alternative ranking in imprecise multi-attribute decision making
- Robustness of Additive Value Function Methods in MCDM
- Establishing dominance and potential optimality in multi-criteria analysis with imprecise weight and value.
- Comparative analysis of multiattribute techniques based on cardinal and ordinal inputs
- Extended methods for identifying dominance and potential optimality in multi-criteria analysis with imprecise information
- Sequential incorporation of imprecise information in multiple criteria decision processes
This page was built for publication: Extreme point-based multi-attribute decision analysis with incomplete information