Are (linguists') propositions (topos) propositions?

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-22221-4_14MaRDI QIDQ3010348zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Carl Pollard

Publication date 1 July 2011

Published in Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22221-4_14

zbMATH Keywords

toposStone dualitypropositionhyperintensionintensionpreboolean algebra

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic of natural languages (03B65) Topoi (18B25) Closed categories (closed monoidal and Cartesian closed categories, etc.) (18D15) Linguistics (91F20) Stone spaces (Boolean spaces) and related structures (06E15)

Recommendations

• Closed categories and categorial grammar
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4106818
• A tale of four grammars
• A Concrete Categorical Model for the Lambek Syntactic Calculus
• Natural language semantics in biproduct dagger categories

Cited in

(5)

• Category theory, logic and formal linguistics: some connections, old and new
• Selectional restrictions, types and categories
• Topologies and sheaves appeared as syntax and semantics of natural language
• A topos-based approach to building language ontologies
• Agnostic hyperintensional semantics

This page was built for publication: Are (linguists') propositions (topos) propositions?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3010348)