On dp-minimal ordered structures

From MaRDI portal
Publication:3011114


DOI10.2178/jsl/1305810758zbMath1220.03037arXiv0909.4242OpenAlexW2962683765MaRDI QIDQ3011114

Pierre Simon

Publication date: 28 June 2011

Published in: The Journal of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0909.4242



Related Items

Externally definable quotients and NIP expansions of the real ordered additive group, Tame topology over definable uniform structures, Pseudo real closed fields, pseudo \(p\)-adically closed fields and \(\mathrm{NTP}_{2}\), CONVEXLY ORDERABLE GROUPS AND VALUED FIELDS, The canonical topology on dp-minimal fields, Distality in valued fields and related structures, Vapnik-Chervonenkis density in some theories without the independence property. II, Non-forking and preservation of NIP and dp-rank, Theories without the tree property of the second kind, Interpretable fields in various valued fields, Pathological examples of structures with o‐minimal open core, On VC-minimal fields and dp-smallness, Burden in Henselian valued fields, Weakly binary expansions of dense meet‐trees, Topological properties of definable sets in ordered Abelian groups of burden 2, DECIDABILITY AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE THEORY OF INTEGERS WITH PRIMES, Some Remarks on dp-Minimal Groups, Some remarks on inp-minimal and finite burden groups, Hereditary G-compactness, On Vapnik‐Chervonenkis density over indiscernible sequences, The \(\aleph_{0}\)-categorical trees, Definable sets containing productsets in expansions of groups, DP-MINIMAL VALUED FIELDS, Strict independence, Vapnik-Chervonenkis density in some theories without the independence property, I, Stationarily ordered types and the number of countable models, HENSELIAN VALUED FIELDS AND inp-MINIMALITY, Witnessing dp-rank, VC-density for trees, Linear orders in NIP structures, Defining integer-valued functions in rings of continuous definable functions over a topological field, Additivity of the dp-rank, AROUND RUBIN’S “THEORIES OF LINEAR ORDER”, Does weak quasi-o-minimality behave better than weak o-minimality?



Cites Work