Making the boundary element method less sensitive to changes or errors in the input data

DOI10.1002/nme.1620240809zbMath0624.65115OpenAlexW2115569579MaRDI QIDQ3026256

Madhukar Vable

Publication date: 1987

Published in: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620240809

zbMATH Keywords

numerical examplesboundary element methodcollocationill-conditioned matrixtwo-dimensional elastostatics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Spectral, collocation and related methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs (65N35) Numerical methods for integral equations (65R20) Integral representations of solutions to PDEs (35C15) Numerical computation of matrix norms, conditioning, scaling (65F35) Laplace operator, Helmholtz equation (reduced wave equation), Poisson equation (35J05) Integral equations of the convolution type (Abel, Picard, Toeplitz and Wiener-Hopf type) (45E10)

Related Items

Controlling errors in the process of automating boundary element method analysis, Solution of potential problems using combinations of the regular and derivative boundary integral equations