Total variation and separation cutoffs are not equivalent and neither one implies the other

From MaRDI portal
Publication:303559

DOI10.1214/16-EJP4687zbMATH Open1345.60077arXiv1508.03913MaRDI QIDQ303559FDOQ303559


Authors: Jonathan Hermon, Hubert Lacoin, Yuval Peres Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 22 August 2016

Published in: Electronic Journal of Probability (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The cutoff phenomenon describes the case when an abrupt transition occurs in the convergence of a Markov chain to its equilibrium measure. There are various metrics which can be used to measure the distance to equilibrium, each of which corresponding to a different notion of cutoff. The most commonly used are the total-variation and the separation distances. In this note we prove that the cutoff for these two distances are not equivalent by constructing several counterexamples which display cutoff in total-variation but not in separation and with the opposite behavior, including lazy simple random walk on a sequence of uniformly bounded degree expander graphs. These examples give a negative answer to a question of Ding, Lubetzky and Peres.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.03913




Recommendations





Cited In (12)





This page was built for publication: Total variation and separation cutoffs are not equivalent and neither one implies the other

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q303559)