Distance-responsive predation is not necessary for the Janzen-Connell hypothesis
From MaRDI portal
Publication:304435
DOI10.1016/j.tpb.2015.10.006zbMath1343.92443OpenAlexW1901013115WikidataQ39494975 ScholiaQ39494975MaRDI QIDQ304435
Simon Maccracken Stump, Peter L. Chesson
Publication date: 25 August 2016
Published in: Theoretical Population Biology (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2015.10.006
coexistencefitness-density covariancehabitat partitioningJanzen-Connell hypothesispredator partitioningspatial storage effect
Related Items
How spatial structure and neighbor uncertainty promote mutualists and weaken black queen effects, How optimally foraging predators promote prey coexistence in a variable environment, Movement, competition and pattern formation in a two prey-one predator food chain model
Cites Work
- Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal?
- Coexistence of competitors in spatially and temporally varying environments: A look at the combined effects of different sorts of variability
- Multispecies competition in variable environments
- General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments.
- Interacting coexistence mechanisms in annual plant communities: frequency-dependent predation and the storage effect
- The storage effect due to frequency-dependent predation in multispecies plant communities