Distance-responsive predation is not necessary for the Janzen-Connell hypothesis
DOI10.1016/J.TPB.2015.10.006zbMATH Open1343.92443OpenAlexW1901013115WikidataQ39494975 ScholiaQ39494975MaRDI QIDQ304435FDOQ304435
Authors: Simon Maccracken Stump, Peter Chesson 
Publication date: 25 August 2016
Published in: Theoretical Population Biology (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2015.10.006
Recommendations
- The storage effect due to frequency-dependent predation in multispecies plant communities
- The storage effect due to frequency-dependent predation in multispecies plant communities
- How optimally foraging predators promote prey coexistence in a variable environment
- The dynamics of predation and competition in patchy environments
- The role of variability and risk on the persistence of shared-enemy, predator-prey assemblages
coexistencefitness-density covariancehabitat partitioningJanzen-Connell hypothesispredator partitioningspatial storage effect
Cites Work
- Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal?
- Coexistence of competitors in spatially and temporally varying environments: A look at the combined effects of different sorts of variability
- Multispecies competition in variable environments
- General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments.
- Interacting coexistence mechanisms in annual plant communities: frequency-dependent predation and the storage effect
- The storage effect due to frequency-dependent predation in multispecies plant communities
Cited In (3)
This page was built for publication: Distance-responsive predation is not necessary for the Janzen-Connell hypothesis
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q304435)
