Prathap's best-fit paradigm and optimal strain recovery points in indeterminate tapered bar analysis using linear element
DOI10.1002/CNM.1197zbMath1274.74449OpenAlexW2122866203MaRDI QIDQ3060246
Somenath Mukherjee, P. Jafarali
Publication date: 1 December 2010
Published in: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.1197
finite element analysisbest-fit paradigmlocal and global errorsoptimal points for strain and stress recoveryPrathap pointsstatically indeterminate tapered bar
Rods (beams, columns, shafts, arches, rings, etc.) (74K10) Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics (74S05)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- The finite element method in structural mechanics. Principles and practice of design of field-consistent element for structural and solid mechanics
- Analysis of shear locking in Timoshenko beam elements using the function space approach
- Conservation of Best-Fit Paradigm at an Element Level
- Optimal stress recovery points for higher-order bar elements by Prathap's best-fit method
- Optimal stress locations in finite element models
- Locations of optimal stress points in higher-order elements
- Barlow points and Gauss points and the aliasing and best fit paradigms
- Why do Barlow points not coincide with the reduced Gauss quadrature points for higher‐order finite elements?
- More on optimal stress points—reduced integration, element distortions and error estimation
This page was built for publication: Prathap's best-fit paradigm and optimal strain recovery points in indeterminate tapered bar analysis using linear element
