On a nontrivial knot projection under (1,3) homotopy
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: In 2001, "Ostlund formulated the question: are Reidemeister moves of types 1 and 3 sufficient to describe a homotopy from any generic immersion of a circle in a two-dimensional plane to an embedding of the circle? The positive answer to this question was treated as a conjecture ("Ostlund conjecture). In 2014, Hagge and Yazinski disproved the conjecture by showing the first counterexample with a minimal crossing number of 16. This example is naturally extended to counterexamples with given even minimal crossing numbers more than 14. This paper obtains the first counterexample with a minimal crossing number of 15. This example is naturally extended to counterexamples with given odd minimal crossing numbers more than 13.
Recommendations
Cites work
Cited in
(7)- When can a link be obtained from another using crossing exchanges and smoothings?
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4211080 (Why is no real title available?)
- Singularities of the projections of n-dimensional knots
- Stable double point numbers of pairs of spherical curves
- On the necessity of Reidemeister move 2 for simplifying immersed planar curves
- (1, 2) AND WEAK (1, 3) HOMOTOPIES ON KNOT PROJECTIONS
- New deformations on spherical curves and Östlund conjecture
This page was built for publication: On a nontrivial knot projection under \((1,3)\) homotopy
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q306123)