Extracting Structural Damage Features: Comparison Between PCA and ICA
DOI10.1007/978-3-540-37258-5_101zbMATH Open1202.94101OpenAlexW71150196MaRDI QIDQ3063181FDOQ3063181
Authors: Luo Zhong, Huazhu Song, Bo Han 
Publication date: 30 December 2010
Published in: Intelligent Computing in Signal Processing and Pattern Recognition (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37258-5_101
Recommendations
- Structural damage detection by integrating independent component analysis and support vector machine
- Enhanced features in principal component analysis with spatial and temporal windows for damage identification
- Improving structure damage identification by using ICA-ANN based sensitivity analysis
- Structural damage detection with damage induction vector and best achievable vector
- Structural Damage Identification Using Assigned Partial Eigenstructure
- Vibration-based construction and extraction of structural damage feature index
- Analyses on structural damage identification based on combined parameters
- Comparison of two techniques for implementing the proper orthogonal decomposition method in damage detection problems
Pattern recognition, speech recognition (68T10) Image processing (compression, reconstruction, etc.) in information and communication theory (94A08) Computing methodologies for image processing (68U10)
Cited In (4)
- Enhanced features in principal component analysis with spatial and temporal windows for damage identification
- Damage detection of refractory based on principle component analysis and Gaussian mixture model
- Mechanism of principal component analysis in structural dynamics under ambient excitation
- Improving structure damage identification by using ICA-ANN based sensitivity analysis
This page was built for publication: Extracting Structural Damage Features: Comparison Between PCA and ICA
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3063181)
